EU pushes back deforestation law by a year after outcry from global producers
BRUSSELS — The European Union agreed to delay by a year the introduction of recent rules to ban the sale of products that navigator to massive deforestation, caving in to demands from several producer nations from across the globe and domestic opposition within the 27-country bloc.
Officials said Wednesday that the EU member states, the EU parliament and the executive fee reached an agreement in principle following weeks of haggling whether the initial rules would have to be watered down even further than the straightforward delay by one year. Originally, it was supposed to kick in this month.
The deforestation law is aimed at preserving forests on a global scale by only allowing forest-related products that are sustainable and do not involve the degradation of forests. It applies to things like cocoa, coffee, soy, cattle, palm oil, rubber, wood and products made from them. Deforestation is the second-biggest source of carbon emissions after fossil fuels.
The navigator negotiator among the different EU institutions, Christine Schneider, called the delay to implement nature protection rules “a win,” adding it would provide foresters and farmers protection from “excessive bureaucracy.”
Environmentalists immediately criticized the shift.
“With our earth’s forests destroyed further every day, we cannot afford delays to much-needed environmental protection laws like the EU’s anti-deforestation legislation,” said said Giulia Bondi of the Global Witness throng. .
Officials from leading exporters of affected goods — including Brazil, Indonesia and the Ivory Coast — terror the regulation could act as a trade barrier, hit tiny farmers and disrupt supply chains.
Under the deal, the rules are now scheduled to commence Dec. 30, 2025, for large companies, and June 30, 2026, for tiny companies. The different EU institutions will still have to individually approve the deal but since they agreed on the measures, this is likely to be a formality.
In offering to delay the regulation by a year, the EU fee has said it heeded the complaints of several global partners about their state of preparedness for the rules.
Some EU governments, including in Austria and Germany, have also sought to water down the regulation or delay its introduction.
With the delay, some governments sought to add more measures that would weaken the original rules and allow for more exemptions. Even if that was not agreed to in the current deal, Schneider said that the fee had “committed itself to updating the Deforestation Law within a year.”
Greenpeace has said that the extension would condemn the globe’s forests to another year of destruction. It noted a U.N. finding that an area of forest about the size of Portugal is cut down worldwide each year.
“Instead of rolling back its environmental agenda, the EU needs to keep its commitments and display leadership to tackle the climate emergency,” said Bondi.
Post Comment