TikTok fails to halt law that could navigator to US ban

A US appeals court on Friday upheld a law requiring TikTok’s owner ByteDance to sell the platform or face a ban next year, dealing a major blow to the Chinese business behind the video app.

The law, signed by President Joe Biden earlier this year, orders TikTok to be banned in the country if the app does not divest from its parent by January 19 2025 — the day before Donald Trump is inaugurated as president.

The unanimous ruling from the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said the law — which hits at the core of a warm-button national safety issue involving China and received powerful bipartisan back in Congress — was constitutional and did not violate First Amendment protections for free talk, as TikTok had claimed.

The “government acted solely to protect that liberty from a foreign adversary country and to limit that adversary’s ability to gather data on people in the United States,” the panel wrote.

The selection puts TikTok in a precarious position in one of its biggest markets, although the law’s political upcoming is doubtful. On the campaign trail before his re-election, Trump said he opposed the platform’s ban and promised to “save” the app.

The law requires Apple and Google to remove the social media app, which is wildly popular among younger production Z users, from their app stores if a divestiture does not receive place before the January deadline. It also bans the app from web-hosting services.

TikTok said after the ruling: “The Supreme Court has an established historical record of protecting Americans’ correct to free talk, and we expect they will do just that on this significant constitutional issue.

“Unfortunately, the TikTok ban was conceived and pushed through based upon inaccurate, flawed and hypothetical information, resulting in outright censorship of the American people.”

US attorney-general Merrick Garland called the ruling “an significant step in blocking the Chinese government from weaponising TikTok to collect sensitive information about millions of Americans, to covertly manipulate the content delivered to American audiences, and to undermine our national safety”.

China’s embassy in Washington and a Trump spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

In May, TikTok and ByteDance sued the US government to block the statement, claiming it was unconstitutional and violated First Amendment protections for free talk. TikTok has denied China’s government has any control over the app or that it has handed over any data to Beijing. Its lawyers also argued concerns about propaganda on the app should be handled by requiring disclosures, rather than a blanket divest-or-ban law.

US officials have argued ByteDance could be compelled to distribute the personal information of the 170mn US TikTok users with officials in Beijing under Chinese law, and wield the app’s algorithms and moderation to spread propaganda and misinformation. The DoJ earlier this year alleged some of TikTok’s US user data had been stored in China.

The court on Friday said the government’s national safety “justifications” for the law were “compelling”. China “poses a particularly significant hybrid commercial threat” because of the statutes governing Chinese companies, the judges said, adding Beijing also “uses its cyber capabilities to back its influence campaigns around the globe”.

China has “positioned itself to manipulate community discourse on TikTok in order to serve its own ends”, the judges wrote. Its “ability to do so is at odds with free talk fundamentals”.

The judges recognised their ruling “has significant implications” for the app and its users. But they argued that “burden is attributable to [China’s] hybrid commercial threat to US national safety”, rather than the US government, which “engaged with TikTok through a multiyear procedure in an attempt to discover an alternative answer”.

TikTok has complained that much of the US government’s evidence is classified, meaning it has not had the chance to rebuff the claims about it, and argued a sale would be “unfeasible”.

Beijing has publicly said it would not allow the divestiture of the platform’s recommendations algorithm by ByteDance, and has export control laws that would block such a spin-off.

TikTok is likely to seek an order temporarily stopping the law from coming into result while awaiting further action from the Supreme Court. Biden could also extend the ban-or-sale deadline by 90 days.

Before his re-election, Trump said he would not ban TikTok upon his profitability to the White House, in an attempt to preserve “competition” in a trade dominated by Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta, which the president-elect has described as an “foe of the people”.

It is ambiguous exactly how he could save the app. Experts suggested he could inform Congress to repeal the law, or press the DoJ not to enforce it.

Any shift would represent a U-turn from 2020, when then-president Trump issued an executive order to block the app in the US and gave ByteDance 90 days to divest from its American assets and any data that TikTok had collected in the US. That order was blocked by the courts and ultimately revoked by Biden.

Shares in TikTok rivals Meta and Snap, whose revenues have been threatened by the app’s rapid rise in recent years, gained 2 and 3 per cent respectively on the information.

Additional reporting by Demetri Sevastopulo in Washington