EU leaders insist no decisions can be taken about Ukraine without Ukraine, or behind their backs

BRUSSELS — European Union leaders insisted on Thursday that no decisions can be taken about the upcoming of war-ravaged Ukraine without its consent — or behind the backs of its partners in Europe, barely a month before President-elect Donald Trump takes office.

Ukraine’s position is precarious, more than 1,000 days into the war. Russia continues to make gains on the battlefield, pushing the front line gradually westward despite suffering heavy casualties. Ukraine’s vigor network is in tatters and military recruits are challenging to discover.

In a display of solidarity at a summit in Brussels with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, many EU leaders repeated a variation of what has become a ordinary mantra — nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine, nothing about safety in Europe without Europeans.

“Only Ukraine as the aggressed country can legitimately define what tranquility means —and if and when the conditions are met for credible negotiations,” summit host António Costa said at the complete of the daylong conference of the 27-country bloc.

“So now is not the period to speculate about different scenarios. Now is the period to strengthen Ukraine for all scenarios,” said Costa, the president of the European Council.

On Jan. 20, Trump returns to the White House, having promised to complete the war in Ukraine quickly and talked up his connection with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Many Europeans are concerned that it might outcome in a impoverished deal for Ukraine.

The other large worry is that Putin will use any interregnum to rearm and factor more strife.

Rumors are swirling in Europe about feasible tranquility talks in early 2025, and whether European peacekeepers might be needed to enforce any settlement, but the EU leaders are trying to keep a lid on hazard-taking about what they are prepared to do so as not to tip their hand to Russia.

The priority now, they declare, must be to strengthen Ukraine’s hand, should Zelenskyy decide it’s period to discuss.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said it’s significant to “ensure long-term aid to Ukraine -– it must be obvious that we are prepared to enable back as long as it is needed.” Air defense, artillery and ammunition are high on the list, he told reporters.

Asked about Trump, Scholz said that his impression from talking to the president-elect “is that excellent cooperation between Europe and the U.S. is feasible.” He said that “the principle is always: no decisions over Ukrainians’ heads, and that of course means over those of the European states.”

Luxembourg Prime Minister Luc Frieden had a similar communication.

“We require to stand with Ukraine, and every step … needs to be taken with Ukraine and in the presence of the European Union. The upcoming of Ukraine is decided in Europe and not elsewhere,” he said.

Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof underlined that only Ukraine can determine the conditions for talks, “and it is not for us to talk about that. At the instant, Ukraine has not yet indicated that they are prepared to do so.”

Zelenskyy said Kyiv needs the EU and U.S. to remain united next year, saying that “only together the United States and Europe can stop Putin and save Ukraine.” He said that the only effective safety guarantee remains NATO membership.

Zelenskyy, in his talk to the leaders posted on his website, thanked France for its “initiative for a military contingent in Ukraine as part of these guarantees and (calls) on other partners to join this attempt, it will assist bring the war to an complete.”

It’s challenging to forecast what Trump might do, and whether history might be a reliable navigator.

Under his previous presidency, in 2020, the United States inked a deal on a military removal from Afghanistan directly with the strongest player — the Taliban insurgents — mostly playing down the concerns of the Afghan government and president.

The disordered exit in 2021, finally ordered by President Joe Biden, humiliated Washington and its allies in NATO as the Afghan safety forces they had trained for years and invested billions in collapsed and the Taliban swept to power.

In Ukraine, the 27-country EU has provided at least as much back — more than 180 billion euros ($187 billion) since Russia began its packed-fledged invasion almost three years ago — as the United States.

But while the globe’s biggest buying and selling bloc can probably continue to prop up Ukraine’s ravaged economy, the EU is almost certainly unlikely to be able provide the military backing that the country’s armed forces would require to prevail.

___

Associated Press writers Raf Casert in Brussels, and Geir Moulson in Berlin, contributed to this update.