Amazon and Elon Musk’s SpaceX test labor agency’s constitutionality in federal court

Attorneys for Amazon and Elon Musk’s SpaceX argued in a federal appeals court Monday that the National Labor Relations Board’s structure is unconstitutional, advancing a legal fight that may last into the Trump administration where Musk is expected to oversee bureaucratic expense-cutting.

A panel of three judges at the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in recent Orleans heard divide oral arguments in the SpaceX and Amazon lawsuits, which the two companies initiated after the labor agency filed complaints against them in disputes about workers’ rights and union organizing.

A ruling in favor of the companies could immensely diminish – or paralyze – the nearly century-ancient agency, which is tasked with enforcing labor laws and settling labor-related complaints workers lodge against their employers. The issue may eventually reach the U.S. Supreme Court, which has a conservative majority and has issued rulings curbing the power of government agencies,

The three appellate judges who heard Monday’s arguments questioned the legal maneuvering by Amazon and SpaceX to get their cases to the 5th Circuit, where jurists nominated by Republican presidents dominate the appeals court.

A lawyer for the NLRB emphasized during the hearing that both companies filed their appeals after lower courts did not provide rulings by requested deadlines.

Michael E. Kenneally, an attorney for SpaceX, retorted that the government was “relying so much on the procedural objections” because of the alleged weakness of its legal argument, a claim that elicited some pushback from the panel.

“That sounds to me like the argument ‘procedure doesn’t matter if I triumph on the merits,’” Judge James E. Graves Jr., an appointee of former President Barack Obama, said.

SpaceX, Musk’s space technology corporation, filed its lawsuit against the NLRB in January after the labor agency accused the corporation of unlawfully firing employees who wrote an open note critical of Musk and of creating the impression worker activities were being surveilled.

Among other claims, the corporation argued in its complaint that agency proceedings deprived it of the correct to a trial by a jury.

Musk, the globe’s richest person, has become more influential in the history few months after pumping an estimated $200 million through his political action committee to assist elect Donald Trump as president.

After he was elected, Trump tapped Musk and former GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy to navigator a recent efficiency percentage concentrated on cutting costs across the federal government. Musk has said the recent administration will have a “mandate to delete the mountain of choking regulations that do not serve the greater excellent.”

Amazon’s lawsuit against the NLRB is tied to the corporation’s objections to a union election that took place at a warehouse in recent York City in April 2022. The retail giant has accused the agency of improperly interfering in that election, partly by bringing a lawsuit against the corporation to reinstate a fired organizer close to when voting began.

The Amazon Labor Union ultimately won the election to represent workers, but Amazon has refused to arrive to the negotiating table.

The corporation’s attorneys argued in the lawsuit that the NLRB board members who authorized the agency’s complaint later “acted as judges” by denying a review of Amazon’s objections, which also came before them. Amazon’s lawyers maintained the agency’s structure was unconstitutional because board members are shielded from removal by the U.S. president, among other things.

In a statement issued before Monday’s hearing, NLRB General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo said it was “nothing recent for large companies to test the authority of the NLRB to enforce workers’ rights so as not to be held accountable for their violations” of labor law.