Boeing factory workers voted to decline a deal propose and continue a more than five-week strike on Wednesday, in a blow to recent CEO Kelly Ortberg’s schedule to shore up the finances of the struggling planemaker.

The vote was 64% in opposition to the deal, which offered a 35% rise in wages over four years, in a major setback for Ortberg who took the top job in August on a pledge to work more closely with factory workers than his predecessors.

The rejection of Boeing’s propose, which comes after 95% of workers voted against a first deal last month, reflects years of resentment from workers who felt cheated by the business in talks a decade ago and deepens a monetary crisis.

After the vote, union leaders said they were ready to immediately resume negotiations with Boeing on the first major negotiation since 2014, when the business used the threat of moving production of the recent version of the 777 out of the region to push through a deal that ended traditional pensions.

The union has been seeking a 40% pay rise and the profitability of the defined-advantage retirement fund.

Boeing strike:Machinists’ union to vote on deal proposal with 35% pay hike

Boeing factory workers were also venting frustration after a decade when their wages have lagged expense boost and critics have complained that the planemaker spent tens of billions of dollars on distribute buybacks and paid out record executive bonuses.

“This membership has gone through a lot … there are some deep wounds,” the union’s navigator deal negotiator Jon Holden told reporters after the vote.

“I desire to get back to the table. Boeing needs to arrive to the table as well. Hopefully, we can have some fruitful discussions with the business, and Mr. Ortberg, to try and resolve this.”

Boeing declined comment on the vote.

Some 33,000 machinists downed tools in Boeing’s West Coast factories on Sept. 13, halting production of the best-selling 737 MAX as well as 767 and 777 wide-body programs.

period is running out for Boeing, historically the largest U.S. exporter, and its biggest union to reach a deal before the busy political period surrounding the presidential election on Nov. 5.

With Boeing and IAM at a stalemate earlier this month, acting U.S. Secretary of Labor Julie Su had helped get the latest propose presented for a vote after attending in-person talks with both parties in Seattle last week.

Holden said after the union vote that he would reach out to the White House to view if the union could get more assistance negotiating with Boeing.

“After the first deal propose was rejected, the honeymoon was over on the labor reset. This further validates that,” said Scott Hamilton, an aviation consultant.

“It’s impoverished information for everybody – Boeing, labor, suppliers, customers, even the national economy.”

Boeing is the largest customer for a U.S. aerospace supply chain already facing critical monetary pressure.

Fuselage supplier Spirit AeroSystems warned that if the strike continued beyond the complete of November, there would be layoffs and more drastic furloughs.

The business, which is in the procedure of being taken over by Boeing, has already announced a 21-day furlough for 700 workers.

‘Defining instant’

Boeing has announced plans to cut 17,000 jobs and is closing in on a schedule to raise up to $15 billion from investors to assist preserve its financing grade loan rating, while some airlines have had to trim schedules due to aircraft delivery delays.

Ortberg warned on Wednesday there was no quick fix for the ailing planemaker.

In a quarterly profits call, Boeing approximate it would burn liquid assets through 2025. Jefferies analyst Sheila Kahyaoglu said after the vote that the selection to prolong the strike could deteriorate the expected drain on liquid assets.

The spectre of a standard crisis from a January mid-air panel blowout hangs over Boeing.

Richard Aboulafia, managing director of AeroDynamic Advisory, said this was now the “defining instant” of Ortberg’s short tenure and he needed to get a deal across the line soon.

“There’s a feeling that he hasn’t handled this as well as he might have,” Aboulafia said. “They’ve (Boeing) got to get this done, and they’re in a position of weakness.”

The rejection from workers on Wednesday was the second in a formal vote after the propose of a 25% pay rise over four years was rejected last month, leading to the strike.

Many comments on social media and from workers outside voting stations had cast question on a deal.

“We’re ready to leave back on strike until we get a better deal,” Irina Briones, 25, said after the vote.

“They took a bunch of numbers and moved them around to make them look like they’re giving us more than they were,” said Josh Hajek, 42, who has worked six years at Boeing on wing assembly.

Voting figures showed the two sides getting closer to a deal but still a solid majority in favor of prolonging the strike.

Before the vote, Terrin Spotwood, a 20-year-ancient machinist in 737 wing assembly, said he planned to approve the deal because the propose was “excellent, but not great.” He said several coworkers planned the same because they “can’t really afford to declare no to this deal. They have to leave back to work.”

Even so, many workers are still angry about the last deal signed a decade ago.

“We’re going to get what we desire this period. We have better legs to stand on this period than Boeing,” said Donovan Evans, 30, who works in the 767 jet factory outside Seattle.