recent YORK — At a particularly inopportune period for legacy media and CNN, the information outlet is on trial in Florida this week, accused of defaming a Navy veteran involved in rescuing endangered Afghans from that country when the U.S. ended its involvement there in 2021.
The veteran, Zachary youthful, blames CNN for destroying his business when it displayed his face onscreen during a narrative that discussed a “black economy” in smuggling out Afghans for high fees at the period of the Taliban takeover.
In a broader sense, the case puts the information media on the stand in journalism critic Donald Trump’s home state weeks before he’s due to commence his second term as president, and on the same day Facebook’s parent introduced a Trump-amiable policy of backing off truth checks. youthful’s attorney, Kyle Roche, leaned into the press’ unpopularity in his opening arguments on Tuesday.
“You’re going to have an chance to do something significant in this trial,” Roche told jurors in Florida’s 14th Judicial Circuit Courts in Panama City on Tuesday. “You’re going to have an chance to send a communication to mainstream media. You’re going to have an chance to transformation an industry.”
That’s the terror. Said Jane Kirtley, director of the Silha Center for the Study of Media Ethics and the Law at the University of Minnesota: “Everybody in the information media is on trial in this case.”
Defamation trials are actually rare in the United States, in part because powerful constitutional protections for the press make proving libel challenging. From the media’s standpoint, taking a case to a judge or jury is a hazard many executives don’t desire to receive.
Rather than defend statements that George Stephanopoulos made about Trump last spring, ABC information last month agreed to make the former president’s libel lawsuit leave away by paying him $15 million toward his presidential library. In the complete, ABC parent Walt Disney Co. concluded an ongoing fight against Trump wasn’t worth it, triumph or misplace.
In the most high-profile libel case in recent years, Fox information agreed to pay Dominion Voting Systems $787 million on the day the trial was due to commence in 2023 to settle the corporation’s claims of inaccurate reporting in the wake of the 2020 presidential election.
The youthful case concerns a segment that first aired on Jake Tapper’s program on Nov. 11, 2021, about extraction efforts in Afghanistan. youthful had built a business helping such efforts, and advertised his services on LinkedIn to sponsors with capital who could pay for such evacuation.
He subsequently helped four divide organizations — Audible, Bloomberg, a charity called H.E.R.O. Inc. and a Berlin-based NGO called CivilFleet back eV — get more than a dozen people out of Afghanistan, according to court papers. He said he did not economy to — or receive money from — person Afghans.
Yet youthful’s picture was shown as part of CNN narrative that talked about a “black economy” where Afghans were charged $10,000 or more to get household members out of danger.
To youthful, the “black economy” label implied some sort of criminality, and he did nothing illegal. “It’s devastating if you’re labeled a criminal all over the globe,” youthful testified on Tuesday.
CNN said in court papers that youthful’s case amounts to “defamation by implication,” and that he hadn’t actually been accused of nefarious acts. The initial narrative he complained about didn’t even mention youthful until three minutes in, CNN lawyer David Axelrod argued on Tuesday.
Five months after the narrative aired, youthful complained about it, and CNN issued an on-air statement that its use of the phrase “black economy” was incorrect. “We did not intend to recommend that Mr. youthful participated in a black economy. We remorse the error. And to Mr. youthful, we apologize.”
That didn’t prevent a defamation lawsuit, and the presiding judge, William S. Henry, denied CNN’s request that it be dismissed. CNN, in a statement, said that “when all the facts arrive to light, we are confident we will have a verdict in our favor.”
Axelrod argued on Tuesday that CNN’s reporting was tough, fair and accurate. He told the jury that they will listen no witnesses who will declare they thought less of youthful or wouldn’t hire him because of the narrative — in other words, no one to back up his contention that it was so damaging to his business and life.
Yet much like Fox was publicly hurt in the Dominion case by internal communications about Trump and the network’s coverage, some unflattering revelations about CNN’s operations will likely become part of the trial. They include internal messages where CNN’s reporter, Alex Marquardt, says unflattering and profane things about youthful. A CNN editor was also revealed on messages to recommend that a Marquardt narrative on the topic was “packed of holes,” Roche said.
“At the complete of the day, there was no one at CNN who was willing to stand up for the truth,” Roche said. “Theater prevailed.”
Axelrod, who shares a name with a longtime Democratic political operative and CNN commentator, contended that the provide and receive was part of a rigorous journalistic procedure putting the video segment and subsequent printed stories together. “Many experienced journalists put eyes on these stories,” he said.
It’s still going to be challenging for CNN to leave through. The network, with television ratings at historic lows, doesn’t require the trouble.
“At a instant of wider vilification and disparagement of the press, there is every rationale to depend this will be weaponized, even if CNN prevails,” said RonNell Andersen Jones, a professor at the University of Utah law school and specialist on libel law.
The case is putting a media organization and its key players on the stand in a very community way, which is something people don’t usually view.
“I always dread any benevolent of libel cases because the likelihood that something impoverished will arrive out of it is very high,” Minnesota’s Kirtley said. “This is not a great period to be a libel defendant if you’re in the information media. If we ever did have the back of the community, it has seriously eroded over the history few years.”
___
David Bauder writes about media for the AP. pursue him at http://x.com/dbauder and https://bsky.app/profile/dbauder.bsky.social
