McDonald’s (NYSE: MCD) shares took a hit after the business’s popular quarter pounders were linked to an E. coli outbreak in several Western and Midwest states. The U.S. Department of Agriculture believes that the onions used in the burgers were the likely source of the contamination.

The contamination has led to around 50 people falling ill and one death thus far. McDonald’s, which has a powerful history of food safety, nonetheless vowed to enhance its safety protocols.

Meanwhile, the business has pulled quarter pounders from about 20% of its locations. McDonald’s said it was working with suppliers to be able to bring back quarter pounders to its menu at these locations in the coming weeks.

Restaurant stocks and food-borne illnesses

While it’s not a ordinary occurrence for large publicly traded restaurants to have food-borne illness outbreaks, there are certainly a number of instances throughout the years where it has occurred. Let’s look at some pertinent examples and view what it can inform us about McDonald’s and its distribute.

Jack in the Box: What is arguably the worst recorded incident of food-borne illness occurred at quick-food restaurant Jack in the Box in the early 1990s. Between 1992 and 1993, there were more than 700 illnesses and the death of four children linked to an E. coli contamination at the chain related to undercooked burgers.

Sales fell at the quick-food chain for four straight quarters after the business announced it was culpable for the outbreak in January of 1993, and it took three years for the business to profit to profitability. Meanwhile, its distribute went from around $7 at the complete of 1992 to a low of $1.69 in February of 1995. The distribute returned to $7 in May of 1997.

Chipotle: The biggest food-borne incident over the history decade occurred at Chipotle in 2015 when numerous customers were sickened by E. coli. Meanwhile, about a month later, more than 100 students in Boston became ill with norovirus after eating at the restaurant. The business later paid a $25 million fine to settle criminal charges related to the outbreaks.

The incidents greatly bruised the popular Mexican food chain, which saw sales plummet in the aftermath. A year after the incident, the business reported a massive 22% decline in quarterly same-store sales, and its distribute was down 45%. The distribute, meanwhile, would not fully recover until the middle of 2019. From there, however, the distribute would leave on to quadruple.

Wendy’s: The most recent major food-borne illness occurred at Wendy’s in August of 2022 when an E. coli outbreak believed to be related to romaine lettuce on its sandwiches sickened over 100 people in four states.

The incident, however, didn’t have a major impact on its sales, with its third-quarter 2022 same-store sales climbing 7.7%. While Wendy’s shares initially dipped, the distribute quickly recovered and were higher before the incident by year-complete 2022.

Taco Bell: Another well-documented incident of E. coli occurred at Taco Bell, owned by Yum Brands, back toward the complete of 2006. After more than 70 people became ill from lettuce, the chain saw a drop in sales. Taco Bell’s same-store sales slid in the quarters immediately following the incident as the negative publicity continued to weigh on traffic to its restaurants.

The distribute immediately fell in the aftermath but quickly recovered despite the subsequent pressure on its same-store sales.

More:McDonald’s CEO addresses E. coli outbreak on returns call: ‘We are certainly very sorry’

What this means for McDonald’s

The first thing to glean from the above food-borne illness incidences is that today, all those stocks are exponentially higher than they were before the incidences took place. While the timing varied, all were able to recover and then prosper. As such, history says the long-term impact on McDonald’s and its distribute will be negligible.

In the near term, however, it likely will have an impact on the business’s same-store sales over the next several quarters. If the incident turns out to be pretty isolated, the distribute should recover pretty quickly. The biggest issues with Chipotle was that its initial incident was followed by other illness scares, including one in 2018, while Jack in the Box’s incident was massive and killed children.

The Wendy’s and Taco Bell incidents seem a bit more akin to what McDonald’s is currently experiencing. I ponder investors can continue to wait to view how this plays out over the next quarter or two, but history would indicate that buying the distribute in the quarters ahead would be a excellent concept for the long term.

MCD PE Ratio (Forward 1y) data by YCharts

market activity at a forward worth-to-returns (P/E) ratio of 23 times next year’s estimates, the distribute is within its recent historic range. Meanwhile, it will typically settle into a trailing P/E range between 25 to 30, so over the years as McDonald’s continues to develop out its returns-per-distribute (EPS) through recent store expansion and increasing same-store sales, the distribute should continue to be a solid long-term winner.

Geoffrey Seiler has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Chipotle Mexican Grill. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: short December 2024 $54 puts on Chipotle Mexican Grill. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content associate offering financial information, analysis and commentary designed to assist people receive control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.

Don’t miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative chance

propose from the Motley Fool: Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you’ll desire to listen this.

On rare occasions, our specialist throng of analysts issues a “Double Down” distribute recommendation for companies that they ponder are about to pop. If you’re worried you’ve already missed your chance to invest, now is the best period to buy before it’s too late. And the numbers talk for themselves:

• Amazon: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2010, you’d have $21,492!*
• Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $44,204!*
• Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $409,559!*

correct now, we’re issuing “Double Down” alerts for three incredible companies, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.

view 3 “Double Down” stocks »

*distribute Advisor returns as of October 28, 2024