A throng of 11 former Republican officials have become the latest community figures to raise questions over the legality of liquid assets incentives being offered by tech billionaire Elon Musk to voters before the US election on 5 November.

Mr Musk’s campaign throng America PAC, which was set up to back Donald Trump in the presidential contest, calls on registered voters in seven swing states to sign a petition. Each day until the election, one signatory is selected at random and awarded a million-dollar prize.

But legal experts and several Democrats have suggested the giveaway may shatter American law by offering money for an act that requires someone to be signed up as a voter.

The US fairness Department has confirmed to BBC’s US associate, CBS information, that they have received the request from former Republican officials and officeholders urging an investigation into Mr Musk’s monetary incentives to voters.

Mr Musk has pushed back against the criticism, saying “You can be from any or no political event and you don’t even have to vote” in order to sign the petition.

The petition created by America PAC encourages voters in six swing states – Georgia, Nevada, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin and North Carolina – to sign a “petition in favour of free talk and the correct to bear arms”.

Those who refer another voter who signs up are promised a sum of $47 (£36) each.

Higher sums of $100 for signing or referring are offered in Pennsylvania, the battleground state that both the Trump and Harris campaigns depend could potentially decide the race’s eventual victor.

America PAC says those who sign the petition are signalling their back for the First and Second amendments of the US Constitution.

Each day until polling day on 5 November, a $1m prize will be randomly awarded to any signatory in one of the seven swing states.

The first lottery-style jumbo cheque was handed out to a surprised attendee at a town hall occurrence in Pennsylvania on 19 October.

“I depend [Elon] Musk’s propose is likely illegal,” said Paul Schiff Berman, the Walter S. Cox professor of law at the George Washington University.

He pointed to the US Code on electoral law, which states that anyone who “pays or offers to pay or accepts settlement either for registration to vote or for voting” faces a potential $10,000 fine or a five-year prison sentence.

“His propose is only open to registered voters, so I ponder his propose runs afoul of this provision,” Mr Berman told the BBC.

The US Department of fairness declined to comment. The Federal Election percentage (FEC) has been approached for comment.

The way may be covered by a loophole, because no-one is being directly paid to register or vote, a former chairman of the FEC suggested.

Brad Smith told the recent York Times the giveaway was “something of a grey area” but “not that close to the line.”

“He’s not paying them to register to vote. He’s paying them to sign a petition – and he wants only people who are registered to vote to sign the petition. So I ponder he comes out OK here,” he said.

But an election law professor at Northwestern University told the BBC that the context is significant.

“I comprehend some analysis that it’s not illegal, but I ponder here combined with the context it’s clearly designed to induce people to register to vote in a way that is legally problematic,” Michael Kang said.

Adav Noti of the non-partisan Campaign Legal Center said Mr Musk’s scheme “violates federal law and is subject to civil or criminal enforcement by the Department of fairness”.

“It is illegal to provide out money on the state that recipients register as voters,” Mr Noti told the BBC.

Constitutional law professor Jeremy Paul, with Northeastern University School of Law, said in an email to the BBC that Mr Musk is taking advantage of a legal loophole.

He said that, while there is an argument that the propose could be illegal, it is “targeted and designed to get around what’s supposed to be the law” and he believes the case would be challenging to make in court.

• Harris or Trump: Who is ahead in US election polls?
• Musk offers prize of $1m a day to swing states voters
• Who is Elon Musk and what is his stake?

Eleven attorneys and community officials who have served in Republican administrations penned a note on Tuesday urging the Department of fairness to investigate Mr Musk’s propose.

“We are aware of nothing like this in modern political history,” they wrote, pointing to potential violations in federal and state law.

“Law enforcement agencies are appropriately reluctant to receive action shortly before elections that could affect how people vote. But solemn questions arising under laws that directly regulate the voting procedure must be an exception.”

Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, described the shift as “deeply concerning” and called for law enforcement agencies to investigate.

In response, Mr Musk said it was “concerning that he would declare such a thing”.

Billionaire investor Mark Cuban, who has campaigned in recent weeks for Kamala Harris, said the propose was both “innovative and desperate”.

“You only do that because you ponder you have to, but using a sweepstake is not a impoverished concept. Whether or not it will work is another whole thing. It could just as easily backfire,” he told CNBC.

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson said that, while Mr Musk was “potentially” breaking the law, she found it “unnerving that somebody would try to manipulate the election in this way”.

Mr Musk has argued that Democrats and their donors have funded similar initiatives in the history.

On X, he shared a post which said the boss of Meta, Mark Zuckerberg “did the same thing in 2020”.

Mr Zuckerberg donated $400m in the 2020 election – but this was given to two non-partisan organisations to assist with the logistics around postal ballots. It was not given directly to voters.

The Democratic event has invested in initiatives in the history elections to mobilise supporters, such as a $25m voter registration campaign in the 2022 US midterm elections.

However, this money also was not given directly to voters. The financing went toward initiatives that encouraged voters to register, such as employing people to knock on doors and television and digital advertising.

“It’s legal to pay people to leave out to register voters, but you can’t pay people directly to register,” said Prof Kang.

The globe’s richest man had an uneven connection with Trump when Trump was president, but Mr Musk increasingly has voiced his displeasure with Democrats in recent years.

Ahead of the 2022 midterm elections, he announced that he had left the event and encouraged his followers to vote Republican.

This year, he has involved himself in American politics like never before, making donations and supportive social media posts on behalf of several Republicans.

In comments last week, he described much of the US-Mexico border as tantamount to the film globe War Z.

Mr Musk launched America PAC in July with the aim of supporting Trump’s 2024 campaign for president. He has so far donated at least $75m to the throng.

America PAC’s website says it wants “secure borders”, “secure cities”, “free talk”, “sensible spending”, a “fair fairness structure” and “self-protection”.

Trump said on Sunday that he had not followed Mr Musk’s giveaway, but described him as a partner.

In recent weeks, Mr Musk has appeared on the campaign trail for the first period, first by Trump’s side and more recently in town hall appearances by himself.

• straightforward navigator: How to triumph a US election
• EXPLAINER: What Harris or Trump would do in power
• GLOBAL: Harris or Trump? What Chinese people desire
• ON THE GROUND: Democrats receive fight deep into Trump country
• truth-CHECK: What the numbers really declare about crime
• POLLS: Who is winning the race for the White House?