Shein lawyer refuses to declare if it uses Chinese cotton

A elder lawyer representing Shein has repeatedly refused to declare whether the business sells products containing cotton from China, prompting an MP to brand her evidence “ridiculous”.

Yinan Zhu, general counsel for the quick-fashion giant, confirmed its suppliers did manufacture products in the country, but declined to declare whether they used Chinese cotton.

Firms that source clothing, cotton, and other products from the Xinjiang region in the north west of China in particular have arrive under pressure following allegations of forced labour and human rights abuses.

Ms Zhu’s refusal to respond questions was met with backlash from a committee of MPs, who accused her of “wilful ignorance”.

Shein has grown rapidly since it was founded in 2008, and saw its business boom during the pandemic.

Its steep rise has meant the business has gone from a little-known brand to one of the biggest quick fashion retailers globally, shipping to customers in 150 countries.

But the business, which was founded in China but is now headquartered in Singapore, has arrive under fire over its environmental impact and working practices, which include allegations of forced labour in supply chains. Shein has denied this.

China has been accused of subjecting members of the Uighur, a mainly Muslim ethnic minority, to forced labour. In December 2020, research seen by the BBC showed that up to half a million people were being forced to pick cotton in Xinjiang, but Beijing has denied any rights abuses.

The allegations have led to some large fashion brands, including H&M, Nike, Burberry and Adidas to remove products using Xinjiang cotton, which has led to a backlash in China, and boycotts of the companies.

On Tuesday, MPs on the Business and Trade committee repeatedly challenged Ms Zhu over whether Shein products contained Chinese cotton and in particular cotton from Xinjiang.

Ms Zhu declined to respond and asked if she could write to the committee following the hearing.

She told MPs that the business does not own any factories or manufacturing facilities, but works with a large network of suppliers, mostly in China, but also in Turkey and Brazil.

She added that Shein complied with “laws and regulations in the countries we operate in”.

Ms Zhu said its suppliers were required to sign up to robust standards and that third event agencies carried out thousands of audits.

Challenged on whether the business specifically prohibits its suppliers from sourcing cotton from Xinjiang as part of its checklist of conditions, she said: “I’m going to have to inquire for permission to write back to this.”

The hearing came after the BBC reported the business had filed initial paperwork to list shares on the London stake trade, which could worth it at £50bn.

Ms Zhu refused to provide answers on the potential listing.

Charlie Maynard, a Liberal Democrat MP on the committee, hit out at Ms Zhu’s comments, and accused her for “wilful ignorance”.

“I am on your website and I can view about 20 products which are all cotton…. and yet you declare to our chair that you can’t state whether Shein is selling any products which are made in China, which are made of cotton? I discover that completely ridiculous,” he said.

“You mention every other spot of the compass, but you don’t mention west China, you don’t mention Xinjiang at all. It’s wilful ignorance.”

Ms Zhu responded saying she was “doing the best I can”, and was “giving answers to the best of my ability”, which prompted Maynard to reply: “That is simply not factual.”

Appearing exasperated, Liam Byrne, chair of the committee, said for a business that sells £1bn worth of goods to consumers, and was looking to list in the UK, the committee had been “pretty horrified by the lack of evidence” Ms Zhu had provided.

“You can’t inform us anything about listing, you can’t inform us anything about cotton in Shein products, and you can’t inform us much, in truth.”

Byrne added that Mr Zhu’s reluctance to respond basic questions “bordered on contempt of the committee”.

In contrast, fellow quick-fashion retailer Temu told the committee that it did not permit sellers from the Xinjiang region to sell products on the platform.

Stephen Heary, elder legal counsel at Temu, said: “Any issues of labour practices are something that we receive fundamentally very seriously.”

Byrne said the business had given “some reassurance” over its supplier agreements.