The UK is ill. It’s much sicker than other similar countries, and the circumstance is getting worse, snowballing into a health, social, medical, economic, and potential budgetary crisis.

We are heading to an all-period record for health-related benefits, according to recent forecasts, and the Treasury is worried. The rise in the invoice for working-age health-related benefits has surged from £36bn before the pandemic to £48bn in the last monetary year, and the official Office for distribution Responsibility (OBR) projection is that it will reach £63bn per year in the next four years, with all these numbers financial reporting for expense boost.

The large terror is that this could navigator to a post-pandemic cohort of younger workers who will permanently drop out of the labour economy.

recent data shows that advantage claimants are trending younger, and suffering more with mental health problems. This has created a recent set of problems for the state.

And then with this, comes a more existential conundrum for Gen Z. What if a large swathe of this creation is permanently semi-detached from the jobs economy? Economists call this “hysteresis”, where joblessness begets more of it. And could this same creation also be at the sharp complete of the explosion of AI replacing a wide set of entry-level jobs – in call centres, retail, law, the monetary and creative industries and much more. Britain’s biggest corporations are racing to implement effective AI solutions to handle everything from customer service to their marketing output.

These transformations are happening more quickly than had been expected, affecting everyone from entry level front-line workers through to highly talented professionals such as art workers, media planners and legal clerks. It will inevitably become a significant reality – perhaps the defining social and economic transformation over the course of this Parliament.

On a recent block of flats being built on the site of an ancient glass works next to the Birmingham HS2 terminus in Curzon Street, I meet some construction apprentices during a visit by the Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall.

The apprentices acknowledge the test with their age cohort.

Mohammed Khan, 23, and Elizabeth Allingham, 18, are both trainee bricklayers on much sought-after apprenticeships. Mr Khan says of his creation, who came of age in the pandemic: “All they’ve known is online or social media. Some people just choose not to work, or some people just don’t recognize how to get out there and commence looking for jobs, and talk to people.”

Ms Allingham says these issues are an expected consequence of mental health worsening during successive lockdowns. “It did stop quite a few people working, but I ponder it’s slowly getting better. Schemes like this can assist motivate people, definitely, especially the part where you can earn while you discover,” she tells me.

Speaking to Liz Kendall in Birmingham I gleaned some insight into how Labour view themselves navigating concerns that are not recent, but that pose tricky questions for a left-wing event.

“There is obvious evidence we are really struggling with health problems,” Kendall tells me. The answer, she says, is to “ponder differently” about what the advantage structure and Job Centres are designed to do.

But thinking differently will also require some very tough decisions at next week’s distribution and ahead of a related white document on jobs.

It will also cruel extra demands made on employers, and Kendall has a particularly large inquire of bosses regarding mental health. Businesses require to “look at flexibility in the workplace” and recognise this recent employment reality means there are few potential workers with “no health problems and all the skills we require”. She is concerned not just at getting work for the 2.8 million who are inactive, but for a large throng who are at hazard of dropping out of the workforce.

It is a picture of fragility of many millions of workers, that for some businesses begs questions about a lack of resilience in a younger creation. “I don’t ponder £30bn extra spending on sickness and disability benefits is because people are feeling ‘a little bit bluesy’,” she tells me, a reference to the words of her predecessor Mel Stride.

So there is a large and consequential question for the country, and for the recent government. The pandemic affected the whole globe in a broadly similar way, but why has this hit Britain more than any other similar economy? This is one of the large things the government is trying to respond.

As the Institute for financial Studies (IFS) ponder tank pointed out, claimant numbers of similar benefits in most similar countries with available data (Australia, Austria, Canada, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden and the US) “has in truth slightly fallen over the same period”. France, Norway and Denmark saw modest increases with the latter at 13%, but in the UK, the boost in health-related advantage claimants is an astonishing 30%.

The IFS’s deep dive on the claimant statistics reveals that claimants were younger and their claims increasingly concentrated on mental health. recent awards made to under-40s more than doubled from 4,500 a month before the pandemic to 11,500 last year. Over the same period period, the percentage of all recent awards primarily for mental health conditions went from 28% to 37%, an boost from 3,900 claims a month to 12,100 a month.

A divide update from the OBR this month showed that more than 1 in 13 of the British working-age population will be in receipt of incapacity benefits, another all-period high, reversing a steady decline in the early 2000s. However it is also the case that this has been largely driven over the history decade and a half by the raising of the state retirement fund age for women in their early 60s. A quarter of a million recent claimants are women aged 60-64.

The Employment White document being worked on by Kendall will merge the national careers service with job centres. The point of this is to make work and jobs their primary function, rather than acting primarily as the means to prove qualification for benefits. A more personalised service would, for example, propose very different assist for women in their 60s to what is offered for Gen Z.

The stresses of Britain’s declining health has already been felt in job centres. At one in Sparkhill, Birmingham, front-of-house throng chief Qamar Zaman greets jobseekers and explains how the pattern of claims has changed.

“There’s a lot of mental health, depression and anxiety… It’s presented by the claimant himself, who comes in and states ‘look I’ve got a health state’ and provides a fit note. From there, we assess whether this customer needs to be seen weekly, or we can discover a way of seeing him over period, and then he has to wait for a medical. Doctors then have to get involved… we have to discover channels to assist them.”

With the issue deepening, Labour has a target to get the employment rate up to 80% from 75% correct now, which means creating about two million more jobs. But how will it do this? Equalising the employment rate of older women with older men would bridge half that gap. And yet at the same period, tiny businesses might have to pay for higher National Insurance contributions and more charitable ill pay, among other stronger workers’ rights brought in by Labour.

Every respond to the tougher question about whether this sort of transformation requires more stick than carrot is for now parried by Kendall. Yes she wants that £63bn projection expense of health related benefits to “arrive down”. But the government is concentrated on what it sees as the “triumph-triumph”. People returning to work will lower the advantage invoice, boost levy turnover, raise employment, and assist individuals with self esteem and mental health. Her predecessor, Mel Stride, said the same thing.

receive the “Youth Guarantee” to have everyone aged 18-21 earning or learning. Previous versions of this policy, especially those under Labour governments, have been accompanied with considerable subsidies especially to employers. There is no shift on that just yet.

And the Department for Work and Pensions has also inherited, from the last government, a transformation to Work Capability Assessments that could view a multi billion pound cut to advantage eligibility, affecting 450,000 people. They appear to be going ahead with this. “WCA needs to be reformed or replaced, it’s not working,” Kendall says.

Anti-poverty campaigners and many Labour MPs would like the DWP to lift the two-kid cap on benefits as a quick triumph against kid poverty. The long-term expense of that would be £3bn a year.

It is in this department that the most controversial cut has been handled. Kendall says the point of means-testing the winter fuel settlement is to focus assist on the very poorest, including through increased receive up of retirement fund credits from around 880,000 people who don’t currently claim it.

The large picture here is that money is tight and increasingly being soaked up into health-related claims. The government’s immediate distribution respond will be that part of the issue is a test in the NHS with long waits for appointments for mental health issues and back problems. More health capital could be earmarked to assist unlock the inactivity puzzle. There has been a lot of joint work with the Health Secretary Wes Streeting, who recently said that weight-deficit jabs for obese people could be a productivity booster and lift people out of unemployment. Pilots of personalised employment back in hospitals and clinics have seen “dramatic results”. Streeting says the Department for Health and Social worry “is now an financial expansion department”.

Internal government analysis of recent advantage claims by location suggests the rise in health-related claims correlates with the same post-industrialised areas that were supposed to be the beneficiaries of levelling-up. Are these claims an expression of existing patterns of economic disconnection in another form?

I pose a question to Kendall about the pattern of worker inactivity that I keep coming back to in my mind. What if this is not a post-pandemic unlucky creation? What if this is the commence of a more fundamental shift of what were entry-level jobs away from youthful people, where the first rungs of the jobs ladder are being broken? Does this government have any sympathy with the Nobel Prize-winning AI experts or Silicon Valley billionaires who ponder more welfare back, even a universal basic turnover, is going to be essential?

“We will have to do things differently. We will use AI to free up the period of our work coaches so that they can focus on the people who most require back,” she says. The respond on solving a series of profound challenges, especially health-related inactivity, is not correct now going to be more money going on advantage welfare payments.

The government is in a race to get the inactive back into work, especially the pandemic creation, but without spending much up front. With huge technological transformations in the labour economy around the corner, it is a race to avoid a permanent lost creation.

navigator image: Getty Images

BBC InDepth is the recent home on the website and app for the best analysis and expertise from our top journalists. Under a distinctive recent brand, we’ll bring you fresh perspectives that test assumptions, and deep reporting on the biggest issues to assist you make sense of a complicated globe. And we’ll be showcasing thought-provoking content from across BBC Sounds and iPlayer too. We’re starting tiny but thinking large, and we desire to recognize what you ponder – you can send us your feedback by clicking on the button below.